69
Score
Grade: C·Jun 22, 2026

Using AI Agents, Building Systems, and Engineering Leadership | WhatWorked.io

https://www.whatworked.io/

AI summary
# AEO Audit Summary WhatWorked.io is a personal blog where the author shares practical insights about AI agents, engineering leadership, and software systems based on real-world experience. The single biggest AEO weakness is the complete absence of byline/author information on the homepage—LLMs cannot attribute or cite content without knowing who wrote it, and adding a clear author name, credentials, and publication dates in the header would dramatically improve citability across all articles.

Live AI Citation Test

Real prompts run against Claude. Is Using AI Agents, Building Systems, and Engineering Leadership being cited?

10
Visibility
20%
Share of Voice
PromptClaude
"What is Using AI Agents, Building Systems, and Engineering Leadership?"
"Best alternatives to Using AI Agents, Building Systems, and Engineering Leadership"
"Is Using AI Agents, Building Systems, and Engineering Leadership worth it?"
"How to build scalable software systems effectively"
"Best practices for engineering leadership and team management"
Cited (domain mentioned) Mentioned (brand only) Absent

AEO Content

7 signals43/100
Direct-Answer Block
25/100

Only 13 words before the first subheading — too thin for AI to extract a self-contained answer.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+6 pts
FAQPage Schema
20/100

No FAQPage schema found.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+6.4 pts
Heading Hierarchy
85/100

Good structure: 1 H1, 20 H2s, 0 H3s.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+0.7 pts
Question-Format Headings
25/100

2 of 20 headings are in question form (10%). — LLMs rarely cite pages with no question-format headings.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+3.6 pts
Structured Data Coverage
30/100

Found schema types: WebSite.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+3.4 pts
Citation-Worthy Facts
90/100

Found 45 specific facts (numbers, dollar amounts, years, percentages) across 530 words.

Content Depth
55/100

Page is 530 words across 20 subsections.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+2.2 pts

AI Bot Access

4 signals100/100
GPTBot (OpenAI)
100/100

GPTBot is allowed to crawl.

ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
100/100

ClaudeBot is allowed to crawl.

PerplexityBot
100/100

PerplexityBot is allowed to crawl.

llms.txt File
100/100

llms.txt detected — you provide AI-friendly site navigation.

Schema Completeness

4 signals68/100
Organization Schema
15/100

No Organization schema detected.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+4.3 pts
Article/BlogPosting Schema
85/100

Not applicable for homepage pages — Article schema is for editorial content only.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+0.8 pts
Breadcrumb Schema
85/100

Not applicable for homepage — it is the root of the hierarchy.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+0.8 pts
Author/Person Schema (E-E-A-T)
85/100

Not applicable for homepage pages — Author/Person schema is for editorial content.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+0.8 pts

Technical Foundation

5 signals90/100
Title Length
55/100

Title is 77 characters: "Using AI Agents, Building Systems, and Engineering Leadership | WhatWorked.io"

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+1.8 pts
Meta Description
95/100

Meta description is 124 characters.

Open Graph Tags
100/100

3 of 3 core Open Graph tags (og:title, og:description, og:image) present.

Canonical URL
100/100

Canonical URL matches page URL.

Mobile Viewport
100/100

Responsive viewport meta tag present.

Run the audit on your own site

Free. 20 signals across 4 pillars. See how well ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini can cite your content.

Scan my site