54
Score
Grade: D·Apr 20, 2026

Indie Hackers: Work Together to Build Profitable Online Businesses

https://www.indiehackers.com/

AI summary
# AEO Analysis Summary Indie Hackers is a community platform where founders share case studies and projects about building profitable online businesses, with sections for job listings, partnership opportunities, and featured success stories. The single biggest AEO weakness is the almost complete absence of structured data (Schema.org markup) that would help LLMs understand the semantic relationships between posts, authors, metrics (upvotes, ARR figures, MRR), and timestamps—adding JSON-LD for Article, Person, and CreativeWork schemas would dramatically improve citability since AI models could reliably extract and attribute specific claims to their sources.

Live AI Citation Test

Real prompts run against Claude. Is Indie Hackers being cited?

30
Visibility
60%
Share of Voice
Prompt
Claude
"What is Indie Hackers?"
"Best alternatives to Indie Hackers"
"Is Indie Hackers worth it?"
"How to build profitable online businesses with developers"
"Best communities for sharing startup revenue and growth strategies"
Cited (domain mentioned) Mentioned (brand only) Absent

AEO Content

7 signals35/100
Direct-Answer Block
25/100

Only 0 words before the first subheading — too thin for AI to extract a self-contained answer.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+6 pts
FAQPage Schema
20/100

No FAQPage schema found.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+6.4 pts
Question-Format Headings
25/100

6 of 56 headings are in question form (11%). — LLMs rarely cite pages with no question-format headings.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+3.6 pts
Structured Data Coverage
10/100

No JSON-LD structured data found.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+4.3 pts
Citation-Worthy Facts
90/100

Found 130 specific facts (numbers, dollar amounts, years, percentages) across 2017 words.

Content Depth
80/100

Page is 2017 words across 8 subsections.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+1 pts

AI Bot Access

4 signals80/100
GPTBot (OpenAI)
100/100

No robots.txt found — all bots allowed by default.

ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
100/100

No robots.txt found — all bots allowed by default.

PerplexityBot
100/100

No robots.txt found — all bots allowed by default.

llms.txt File
20/100

No /llms.txt file found.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+4 pts

Schema Completeness

4 signals24/100
Organization Schema
15/100

No Organization schema detected.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+4.3 pts
Article/BlogPosting Schema
25/100

No Article/BlogPosting schema detected.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+3.8 pts
Breadcrumb Schema
30/100

No BreadcrumbList schema detected.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+3.5 pts
Author/Person Schema (E-E-A-T)
25/100

No author attribution detected.

Fix available
Scan your site to see all fixes →
+3.8 pts

Technical Foundation

5 signals98/100
Title Length
95/100

Title is 66 characters: "Indie Hackers: Work Together to Build Profitable Online Businesses"

Meta Description
95/100

Meta description is 108 characters.

Open Graph Tags
100/100

3 of 3 core Open Graph tags (og:title, og:description, og:image) present.

Canonical URL
100/100

Canonical URL matches page URL.

Mobile Viewport
100/100

Responsive viewport meta tag present.

Run the audit on your own site

Free. 20 signals across 4 pillars. See how well ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini can cite your content.

Scan my site