This was an anonymous scan. Sign up free to see the live AI citation test.
5 real prompts against ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini to see if Email Marketing Software for Bulk Email actually gets cited.
AEO Content
Only 0 words before the first subheading — too thin for AI to extract a self-contained answer.
Only 1 H2 sections — LLMs prefer pages broken into clear subsections.
0 of 9 headings are in question form (0%). — LLMs rarely cite pages with no question-format headings.
Found schema types: WebSite.
Found 27 specific facts (numbers, dollar amounts, years, percentages) across 1831 words.
Page is 1831 words across 1 subsections.
AI Bot Access
GPTBot is allowed to crawl.
ClaudeBot is allowed to crawl.
PerplexityBot is allowed to crawl.
llms.txt detected — you provide AI-friendly site navigation.
Schema Completeness
No Organization schema detected.
No Article/BlogPosting schema detected.
No BreadcrumbList schema detected.
No author attribution detected.
Technical Foundation
Title is 49 characters: "Email Marketing Software for Bulk Email | Maxprog"
Meta description is 139 characters.
3 of 3 core Open Graph tags (og:title, og:description, og:image) present.
Canonical points to https://www.maxprog.com/site/index-us.php, not https://maxprog.com. This is fine if intentional.
Responsive viewport meta tag present.
Run the audit on your own site
Free. 20 signals across 4 pillars. See how well ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini can cite your content.
Scan my site