Octopus.do, Visual Sitemap Tool, Website Planner, Architecture
https://octopus.do/ AI summary
Octopus.do is a visual website planning tool that helps teams create sitemaps, organize content, and plan website architecture with AI assistance. The biggest AEO weakness is the complete absence of structured data markup (Schema.org) that would help LLMs understand the product's key details like pricing tiers, feature descriptions, and use cases—currently these elements are buried in untagged text that AI systems struggle to reliably extract and cite.
Live AI Citation Test
Real prompts run against Claude. Is Octopus.do being cited?
| Prompt | Claude |
|---|---|
| "What is Octopus.do?" | |
| "Best alternatives to Octopus.do" | |
| "Is Octopus.do worth it?" | |
| "How do I create a visual website sitemap" | |
| "Best free tool for website architecture planning" |
AEO Content
First paragraph is 20 words.
Only 2 H2 sections — LLMs prefer pages broken into clear subsections.
0 of 6 headings are in question form (0%). — LLMs rarely cite pages with no question-format headings.
Found schema types: Organization.
Found 3 specific facts (numbers, dollar amounts, years, percentages) across 325 words.
Page is 325 words across 2 subsections.
AI Bot Access
GPTBot is allowed to crawl.
ClaudeBot is allowed to crawl.
PerplexityBot is allowed to crawl.
llms.txt detected — you provide AI-friendly site navigation.
Schema Completeness
Organization schema detected — your brand entity is clear to LLMs.
No Article/BlogPosting schema detected.
No BreadcrumbList schema detected.
No author attribution detected.
Technical Foundation
Title is 62 characters: "Octopus.do, Visual Sitemap Tool, Website Planner, Architecture"
Meta description is 263 characters.
3 of 3 core Open Graph tags (og:title, og:description, og:image) present.
Canonical URL matches page URL.
Responsive viewport meta tag present.
Run the audit on your own site
Free. 20 signals across 4 pillars. See how well ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini can cite your content.
Scan my site